Moral Theory of Kant Essay

Immanuel Kant is a German deontologist in the eighteenth century. He believed that the only rill of whether a decision is estimable or wrong is whether it could be applied to forevery angiotensin converting enzyme. Would it be all pay for everyone to do what you be doing? If not, your decision is wrong. Kant sees that people ought not to be used, but ought to be regarded as having the highest ingrained prise. From here, I see that Kant believes that the intrinsic value of an act determines what is morally remediate or morally wrong.The intrinsic value incessantly accompanies the act, for example, if A is intrinsic to B, then it is no accident that B exhibits A. In ethics, Kant seek to show that doing ones responsibility consisted in following only those principles that one would accept as applying equally to all. Kant brought up that the consequences of our acts are not invariably in our control and things do not always turn out as we want. However, he believed that we c an control our motives, and the motive to do what is right gives an act its moral worth(predicate).For actions to make up moral worth, safe will and favorable act in accord with avocation are required. Kant believed that the good will is the right motive. Good will is to will your motto to be a universal right or universally valid and accepted. Having a right intention is to do what is right or what one believes to be right just because it is right. Kant believed that acts done from the motive of duty are the only ones with moral worth. For example, you accept money from a friend, and your options, or maxims, are to either return the money, or not to return the money.To return money is of good will, and if you choose this to be your maxim, you are in accordance with duty. Not to return money, if impute into a universal law, nobody ever returned the money, and everybody broke their promises, there would be no promises, and the act is not in accordance with duty. So the act of not go the money has no moral worth and is morally wrong. There are cardinal different types of controllings, according to Kant, hypothetical imperative and categorical imperative. an imperative is simply a form of statement that tells us to do something.