Database Comparison of SQL Server 2000, Access, MySQL, DB2, and Oracle

IntroductionThis paper will compare and contrast cardinal different selective informationbase management systems on six criteria. The database management systems (DBMS) that will be discussed are SQL legion 2000, attack, MySQL, DB2, and prophesier. The criteria that will be compared are the systems functionality, the requirements that must be met to run the DBMS, the expansion capabilities if it is able to expand to handle more data over time, the types of companies that typically use each one, the normal usage of the DBMS, and the cost associated with implementing the DBMS.System functionalityMicrosoft Access is a database engine and evolution environment in one package. It is typically workstation-based, and designed to be easy to use, even for users with no experience. However, it as well as provides advanced functionality for experienced users. MySQL is the largest open-source RDMBS, and it is server-based, as well as the rest of the DBMS that will be discussed. According to the mysql.com website, it offers high dependableness and performance, easy use and deployment, freedom from platform lock-in by providing ready rile to source code, and cross-platform support. SQL Server is an enterprise class RDBMS from Microsoft. It is part of the Back postal service Suite of products. Although it is always server-based in production, it merchantman be client-based in development. DB2 is also an enterprise-class DBMS, produced by IBM. It offers some object-oriented functionality, as well as cross-platform compatibility, and is server-based. Finally, Oracle offers much(prenominal) of the same functionality as DB2, with cross-platform capability, and some object-oriented features. It, as well, is server-based.System RequirementsThere is a correlation between the complexity of the DBMS and the system requirements. For instance, Access can be installed on any Windows-based operating system from Windows 95 and above. SQL Server, in the widely used Standard and Enterprise editions, is also strictly Windows-based, besides must be run on Windows NT or 2000 Servers. The personal and development editions of SQL Server may be run on Windows NT Workstation, and Windows 2000 and XP Professional, in amplification to the server platforms. MySQL has a wide variety of platforms, including the Windows platforms, sun Solaris, FreeBSD, Mac OS X, and HP-UX, to list a few. DB2 will run on Windows NT 4 and higher, Sun Solaris, HP-UX and Linux.... ...nThis paper was written to show the similarities and differences in five different databases. It compared Access, MySQL, SQL Server, DB2, and Oracle in six different areas. It found many similarities in functionality, hardly large diversity in pricing. ReferencesChigrik, Alexander, Oracle 9i Database vs DB2 v8.1 (n.d.), retrieved April 6, 2005, from http//www.mssqlcity.com/Articles/Compare/oracle_vs_db2.htmChigrik, Alexander, SQL Server 2000 vs Access 2000 (n.d.), retrieved April 6, 2005, from http//www.m ssqlcity.com/Articles/Compare/sql_server_vs_access.htmChigrik, Alexander, SQL Server 2000 vs DB2 v8.1 (n.d.), retrieved April 6, 2005, from http//www.mssqlcity.com/Articles/Compare/sql_server_vs_db2.htm Chigrik, Alexander, SQL Server 2000 vs MySQL version 4.1 (n.d.), retrieved April 6, 2005, from http//www.mssqlcity.com/Articles/Compare/sql_server_vs_mysql.htm Chigrik, Alexander, SQL Server 2000 vs Oracle 9i (n.d.), retrieved April 6, 2005, from http//www.mssqlcity.com/Articles/Compare/sql_server_vs_oracle.htmMySQL Licensing Policy (n.d.), retrieved April 6, 2005, from the MySQL company website http//www.mysql.com/company/legal/licensing/