Military, Army and War - Military Down Sizing and the Fall of a Great N

Military Down Sizing The Possible Fall of a peachy Nation America is ace the most powerful nations in the world. beingness a strong nation includes having a strong soldiers as well as economy. As one can observe, the U. S. economy is development by leaps and bounds. However, the military is being checkmate sized, and if we do not do something about it, it will continue to be down sized until we check an armed force that will no longer be resourceful of protecting this great nation. Not only will this down sizing affect our ability to protect ourselves, it will similarly cause a substantial loss in economic strength and power abroad. Because military down sizing lessens our power abroad, opens the United States up to a doable invasion, and hurts our economy, the military must be maintained in order to procure a strong, healthy nation both abroad and on the shell front for many centuries to come. Military down sizing is increasing at a rapid rate. This down sizing is pri marily due to reckon cuts. Since the peak of Korean war using up in 1953, military spending has declined in twenty-five of the last thirty-seven years. The name up for Vietnam was presently and followed by an equivalent build down. The Carter-Reagan buildup was longer but smaller than the one for Vietnam, and is currently being succeeded by a new build down (Brauer 299). If history keeps repeating itself, the United States military will continue to build up and then hinder this build up with an even greater build down. As a result the U.S. sustains a weaker more defenceless armed force. The militarys inability to provide its men and women with sufficient transportation is also a problem caused by budget cuts. Many military trucks correspond technolo... ...must always be ready for the least expected. Works Cited Brauer, Jurgen, and Manas Chatterji, eds. Economic Issues of Disarmament. impertinently York New York University Press, 1993. Federation of American Scientis ts. Ed. Marcus Corbin. The New Threats Argument. February 2000. 27 February 2000 <http//www.fas.org/pub/gen/mswg/msbb/new.html>. Hinkle, Jeffrey J. reenforcement the New, Fixing the Old holds the Future for Tactical Trucks. National falsifying 82 (1997-1998) 32-34. Kaminski, Paul G. Building a Ready Force for the 21st Century. Defense Issues 11 (1996) 1-4. Rosello, Lieutenant Colonel Victor M. Predicting the Unpredictable. Military Review 75 (1994-1995) 127-129. Sandler, Todd, and Keith Hartley, eds. The economic science of Defense. New York Cambridge University Press, 1995.