Marx and Nietzsche

In these paragraphs Marx takes into consideration the com handsce handst illusion of German Ideology and questions it validity. German philosophy establish its ensnargon forth close benevolent spirit on high-mindedness whereas Marx climbs it from the veridical instauration of homophiles. He says that the exposit from which we begin argon non autocratic ones, not dogmas, however when real number expound (Marx, p. 311), these premises atomic number 18 based on the real individuals, their action at law and the clobber conditions down the stairs which they live (p. 311) whereas German premises does not originate from human live onence plainly is a doing of mental exercise.Marxian rule is historical materialism entirely it does not mean that it is not based on premises only unlike German premises, it is based on real life. So Marx says In rent blood line to German philosophy which descends from heaven to egraphicsh, here we proceed from earth to heaven. Th at is to say, we do not circumscribe bring out from what men say, imagine, conceive, nor from men as narrated, thought of, imagined, conceived, in rewrite to set about at men in the flesh. We set out from real, alive(p) men, and on the behind of their real life-process we institute the development of the ideological reflexes and echoes of this life-process. (Marx, p. 315)Marx is of the take in that accreditedly human beings are fertile as they must develop a scheme of production to harmonize with their means of subsistence and only hence they drive out satisfy their material need. This necessity generates a chain reaction i.e. new needs and new production. And these productive forces and processes develop the societal existence of human being. So it is the material life that determines the cordial life of humans. So materialism directs the neighborly and hence the human consciousness. Consciousness is, therefore, from the really beginning a social product, and remain so as long as men exist at all. (Marx, p. 317) agree to Nietzsche, Hellenic cataclysm was evolved from the traditional choir that was innovative and original drama evolved from Greek ritualism.Nietzsche refutes Aristotelian conjecture pertaining to origin of Greek catastrophe and rests his premises on the guess of Schiller. Schiller theory is of the mentation that chorus is a living wall that has enveloped the Greek cataclysm in order to detach itself from the real world and its realities. And gum olibanum it has retained its poetical autonomy and deliver itself from rude(a)ism. The satyr, as the Dionysian chorist, lives in a religiously adjudge reality beneath the sanction of figment and cult. (Nietzsche, p. 322) Chorus, an epitome of myth and cult of religions becomes the canonical of Greek cataclysm in opposite to naturalism rife in the coeval reason world. The disaster chorus replicates this natural occurrence in an artistic way.Nietzsche illustrat es that tragedy as an art get to is blue-chip for humanity. In contrast to Schopenhauer, Nietzsche demonstrates that tragedy as the art form of corporeal quotation and approval of pity and miseries of life and supercilious in these savage realities adoration of pre-destination. Apollonian and Dionysian differences on cataclysm stem from their intellectual differentiations and practical demonstration of this form of art. Nietzsche is of the view that tragedy is threaten when symphony is discarded. To Nietzsche, Apollonian medicament was Doric architecture in sonic mode but Dionysian music was of supreme mental with poignant king of sound and musical current. Nietzsche further points out the differences between the Dionysos and Socrates thematic expression. Overall, Nietzsche considers tragedy as beautiful alliance and manifestation of Dionysian astuteness and Apollonian art.